Advisory body the Broadband Stakeholder Group (BSG) has published a report outlining a new way for measuring and forecasting demand for bandwidth in UK homes. The group has called for greater policy attention to be given to how demand relates to infrastructure provision.
Pamela Learmonth, CEO of the BSG, said that despite global interest in whether broadband infrastructure is currently meeting demand and will continue to do so, there is a lack of evidence and methodology available to inform this critical question. “This was our key motivation for commissioning new research in this area and this study presents a technology-neutral approach to forecasting demand, rooted in the applications consumers want to access.”
The model for forecasting bandwidth demand, used in the BSG’s report, combines the usage profiles of various applications with the usage of profiles of individuals. These individual profiles are then combined into various household profiles. 156 household profiles are modelled in the report, based on demographics, intensity of use and TV type. The household profiles have also been combined to create a picture of national demand.
This model indicates that the median household will require bandwidth of 19 Mbps by 2023, whilst the top 1 per cent of high usage households will have demand of 35-39 Mbps. These speeds are lower than those previously cited regarding future capacity needs and the report highlights reasons why this might be the case:
Communications Chambers, who developed the model on behalf of the BSG, has presented a middle case falling between an evolution of today’s consumer expectations of the performance of applications and a perfect world where all applications would be instantaneous. The results are also presented on a ‘four minutes excluded monthly’ basis – i.e. including all required demands except for the four busiest minutes in the month. As the report states, reducing the excluded minutes pushes up the requirement. For example for a four adult, high usage household with a 4K TV, reducing the excluded minutes from four to zero would push the bit rate requirement in 2023 up from 38 Mbps to over 50 Mbps.
The report also highlights a number of sensitivities to the model results which could change anticipated requirements. These include changing user expectations for factors such as download speeds and notably, reducing the time one would expect a software download, such as a console game, and upload of files to take. For example, in significantly reducing the base case assumption of 10 minutes waiting time to 2.5 minutes, then 16 per cent of households require 83 Mbps. Reducing the waiting time further would quickly take demand over 100M bps for those households.
Learmonth added: “In publishing this report we are not presenting a magic number for desired bandwidth speeds one decade out. Rather, we are demonstrating that to facilitate an informed policy debate around whether broadband infrastructure in the UK will enable consumers to do what they want over time, then we need to develop a better evidence base. Like any good maths student, we have not simply given a number, but shown our working. We want to use this to develop a formative and evidence based discussion on future bandwidth needs and what this means for wider broadband policy”.