Should telcos opt for FTTH or DSL?
July 3, 2012
Copper networks continue to be a cash cow for telcos, delivering broadband over DSL to more than 367 million subscribers worldwide in 2011. Fibre to the Home (FTTH) technologies bring ten times the bandwidth compared to advanced DSL technologies. However, upgrades to advanced forms of DSL require a fraction of the investment of upgrades to FTTH.
“Financial instability in the advanced economies of Western Europe and lack of innovative internet video services force Telco’s to look into the cost to value proposition delivered by making large scale investments into FTTH,” according to Adarsh Krishnan, senior analyst of TV & Video at ABI Research. “Strong government initiatives to develop fiber infrastructure have in most cases been a necessary prerequisite to fund FTTH or fiber to the building (FTTB) deployments. These incentives have been strongest in Western Europe and Asia-Pacific.”, according to Sam Rosen, practice director of TV & Video at ABI Research. Worldwide, FTTH/B service revenues reached $29.6 billion in 2011.
Innovative internet video services including IPTV and OTT (at HD resolutions) give Telco’s the necessary competitive edge for triple play (telephone, internet and TV) and quad play (telephone, internet, TV and mobile phone) services that have been lacking against competing cable operators. Even in the absence of fiber upgrades Telco’s can compete with triple-play services; for example, AT&T U-verse delivers IPTV over ADSL2 at 15 Mbps bandwidth. Global revenues from DSL broadband services have seen incremental growth in service revenue to reach $106 billion with a CAGR growth of 14 per cent in the last 5 years up until 2011. Asia-Pacific continued to be a critical growth region for DSL broadband with China playing a dominant role accounting for 33 per cent of the worldwide subscribers in 2011.